Project Mini J
Monday, 31 January 2022
Wednesday, 18 August 2021
Friday, 23 July 2021
Miscarriage Risk Score
Found this research article written by KKH doctors (and my IVF doctor is part of the team).
(Click on image to go to website.)
My paraphrase of the formula from the article:
Add up the score of the factors that applies to you.
Of course, I am interested to find out what's my risk score. Based on the formula, my score is 6, translating to intermediate risk of 17%, which doesn't seem too bad. However, the sample size of "age 35 and above" is only 37 (8%), which is probably not large enough.
In case you are not familiar with scientific research methodolody, I want to mention that every research has its limitations, which are often mentioned in the article itself. Hence, to get the full picture, you need to read this part too.
(Click on image to go to website.)
My paraphrase of the formula from the article:
Miscarriage Risk Factors | Scores |
Age 30 to 34 | 2 |
Age 35 and above | 4 |
Indian | 2 |
History of pregnancy loss | 2 |
Underweight (BMI below 18.5) | 2 |
Overweight (BMI 23 and above) | 1 |
Smoker | 3 |
Alcohol intake above 250 ml/week | 2 |
No dietary supplement intake | 2 |
Of course, I am interested to find out what's my risk score. Based on the formula, my score is 6, translating to intermediate risk of 17%, which doesn't seem too bad. However, the sample size of "age 35 and above" is only 37 (8%), which is probably not large enough.
In case you are not familiar with scientific research methodolody, I want to mention that every research has its limitations, which are often mentioned in the article itself. Hence, to get the full picture, you need to read this part too.
Monday, 12 July 2021
Blastocyst Pendant
Thursday, 8 July 2021
Wednesday, 2 June 2021
IVF Fresh #3 Summary
Pre-Cycle Counting Down
IVF Fresh Cycle 3
Comparing my three fresh cycles
2 months | Consultation with Dr Sadhana Blood test to measure my AMH HIV blood test for hubby because his has expired |
7 weeks | Pelvis ultrasound at Thomson Medical Centre (to skip long queue at KKH) |
6 weeks | Hubby went for sperm analysis |
3 weeks | IVF Briefing / Counselling |
IVF Fresh Cycle 3
CD1 | Call KKIVF |
CD2 / Stim Day 1 | Baseline scan: small follicles in both ovaries; lining 5 mm 350 IU Gonal-F injections daily for 4 days |
CD6 / Stim Day 5 | 350 IU Gonal-F & 0.25 mg orgalutran injections daily for 2 days |
CD8 / Stim Day 7 | Largest follicle at 14 mm 350 IU Gonal-F & 0.25 mg orgalutran injections daily for 3 days |
CD11 / Stim Day 10 | Largest follicle at 20.5 mm 350 IU Gonal-F & 0.25 mg orgalutran injections daily for 1 day |
CD12 / Stim Day 11 | Largest follicle at 23 mm Last 0.25 mg orgalutran injection in the morning Trigger injection (triptorelin) at 9.30 pm |
CD14 | ER at 9.30 am (reporting time 8.15 am) |
Comparing my three fresh cycles
Fresh #1 Dec 2015 | Fresh #2 Feb/Mar 2017 | Fresh #3 May 2021 | |
AMH | 7.4 ng/mL | - | 4.7 ng/mL |
FSH injection | 300 IU Puregon | 250 IU Puregon | 350 IU Gonal-F |
No. of eggs retrieved | 24 | 30 | 16 |
No. of embryo frozen | 6 Day-2 | 5 Day-5 | 1 Day-5 |
Wednesday, 5 May 2021
PGD becomes Mainstream Clinical Service
Thursday, 4 March 2021
PGS Statistics
Who is eligible for PGS trial?
[0:25] (1) 35 years old and above, (2) suffered 2 or more recurrent implantation failures, or (3) experience 2 or more pregnancy losses
How much does it cost the government?
[1:07] $1.7 million
How much does it cost the patient?
[1:23] $1,100 per test on average for consumables + $2,500 to $4,500 for embryo biopsy
What is the success rate?
[1:56] 367 patients signed up
[4:02] 104 patients had embryo biopsy done
[4:38] 60 patients completed embryo transfer
[4:42] 15 live births
[4:44] 8 miscarriages
[4:45] 8 ongoing pregnancies
My thoughts:
The news about PGS trial was released in the press back in Nov 2016. At that time, I fulfilled two eligibility criteria and was qualified. Back then, it was before I had my 2nd miscarriage and before I had karyotyping done on my pregnancy tissues. Therefore, I was not aware of my actual problem. Before embarking on my 2nd fresh cycle, I asked my IVF doctor if I could be enrolled for PGS trial. However, at that time, there was a delay in the commencement of the trial and hence this was not an option for me if I didn't want to wait. By the way, PGS can only be done during a fresh cycle (at least in Singapore's SOP).
On hindsight, it was a blessing in disguise. Based on the karyotyping done in Oct 2017, my implantation failures and miscarriages were not likely due to chromosomal abnormalities. Also, based on the result of my recurrent pregnancy loss investigation, these were more likely due to thrombophilia aka sticky blood. Cost wise, it was way cheaper to do karyotyping (about $600) compared to PGS (about $3000) to find out that my embryos were normal. Ultimately, PGS would not have changed any outcome for me.
Looking at the statistics provided by MOH, at best 23 live birth out of 60 embryo transfer (38.3% success rate), doesn't seem very worth the investment. But to a couple wanting their own kid, all these numbers may not matter at all. I would try everything that somewhat make sense, until I have exhausted all options within my means.
One question that is significant to me - of these 15 lives births, how many had recurrent failed IVF or miscarriages? If these 15 patients are only 35 years and above, and not had failed IVF or miscarriages, it could be very possible that they would be successful without PGS. Considering the high out-of-pocket cost involved, I would think that they are more than just "35 years old and above".
I strongly believe that there needs to be more investigation before attempting PGS. But because there are so many unknowns and so many under-researched areas or research with conflictling/ inconclusive results, many OBGYN and IVF doctors remains doubtful of autoimmunity issues (perhaps with the exception of thyroid). But guess what, the controversial protocol worked for me!
$1.7 million of tax payer's money can be used in so many other ways to help the vulnerable groups and the under-privileged. I don't mean throwing out PGS all together because this may just be the answer, if there is no other explanation for the infertility after a truely thorough investigation including autoimmunity, sperm DNA fragmentation test, etc. And yes, my personal opinion is that the investigation at public hospitals are not thorough enough.
Monday, 1 March 2021
Trying for Mini J #2
pre-cycle | Start 100mg aspirin* + 2mg (2 tabs) methyl folate* + 1000iu vitamin D* |
CD2 | Start 8mg (4 tabs) progynova |
CD5 | Start 10mg (2 tabs) prednisolone* |
CD12 | Scan - lining 8.2mm trilaminar |
CD14 | Start crinone twice daily + 0.4ml clexane* nightly |
CD19 | ET at 2pm. Increase to 20mg (4 tabs) prednisolone* |
14dp5dt | beta-hCG - 1731.7 IU/L Received 1 shot of proluton^ + Start 10mg duphaston^ twice daily |
15dp5dt | Minor bleeding in the late evening. Increase to 20mg (2 tabs) duphaston twice daily. Stop clexane and aspirin |
18dp5dt | Received 1 shot of proluton |
19dp5dt | Spotting reduced. Restart clexane |
22dp5dt | Spotting stopped. Reduced to 10mg duphaston twice daily. |
31dp5dt | First fetal scan. No sac found. Chemical pregnancy. |
*Prescribed by Dr Sheila Vasoo
^Prescribed by Dr Marianne Hendricks
This round, perhaps due to COVID-19, KKIVF was rather empty every time I visited, a vast contrast to the crowd and long wait in the past. The pharmacy, however, was still as crowded as ever.
I was totally caught by surprise that I wouldn't be issued an MC on the day I have to return to KKH for beta-hCG blood test (which is compulsory by the way). Reason? Because I didn't see a doctor. It seems that this is not unique to KKH, NUH doesn't issue MC for the same reason. Didn't need the MC in my last cycle because I took no-pay leave. But I don't know why I only realise this in my 9th cycle; I can't recall if I ever asked for MC in my earlier cycles. If BFP, you have to go back in the afternoon to collect the papers for the next appointment and collect the medications, which meant another 2 hours spent at KKH. Anyway, no biggie for me, but I imagine some may get caught in a stressful situation.
I thought I should explain here that KKH typically prescribe duphaston after beta-hCG if BFP, but for me, Dr Sadhana agreed to my request to continue crinone but this also meant that duphaston wouldn't be in my protocol. Based on my previous pregnancy experience, I went to Dr Marianne Hendricks to ask for more support medications, in hope to prevent bleeding. But this time, bleeding started much earlier at week 4+ than my previous pregnancies (week 5+).
The first pre-natal scan (or dating scan) is typically scheduled 2 weeks after beta-hCG BT. I decided not to waste anymore time at KKH and went straight to my private doctor. At KKH, you have to see the sonographer for scan, then see the doctor to tell you the scan result and issue prescription, and finally queue at the pharmacy to buy medicine. This is too much waiting time for me.
What's the biggest difference between my previous pregnancy and this one? Back in 2018, I had very bad nausea, indigestion and tiredness, starting from around week 5, but all these symptoms have yet to surface at week 6. I was right to be paranoid and worried. How can I be so lucky not to have any major morning sickness this time round. Indeed, something went wrong.
At week 7 (or maybe almost week 7), there was no sac. It was a chemical pregnancy.
Goodbye my angel baby...
Monday, 8 February 2021
Gift from God
(Click on image to go to website.)
A timely reminder that J is "given to us... as an assignment" and we are "to be stewards, responsible to love him, nurture him and bring him up..."
Considering how difficult it was for us to have J, I always have an irrational fear that something bad would happen or I would lose J one day. I need to find peace, let go and let God.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)